You are currently browsing the Frank’s Case Book weblog archives for the day 2010 August 14.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jul | Sep » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
- Afghanistan (4)
- climate change (1)
- Economics (72)
- Education (21)
- health care (9)
- healthcare (8)
- Iraq (5)
- Law (120)
- Politics (387)
- Social Commentary (308)
- terrorism (2)
- Uncategorized (3)
- 2011 September 2: Thoughts on Evolution and Republican Candidates
- 2011 August 13: It's Not the Stimulus It's the Regulation
- 2011 August 6: Liberal Bias in the Media: A Study
- 2011 July 17: Bytes of the Apple
- 2011 June 19: Judge's Lesson
- 2011 June 12: The Quiet Death of the War Powers Act
- 2011 May 29: From Chickens to Rabbits
- 2011 May 8: Quick Thoughts on Bin Laden Killing
- 2011 May 1: Net Neutrality
- 2011 April 17: Atlas Shrugged: The Book and Movie
Columnists
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- May 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- January 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001
- June 2001
- May 2001
- April 2001
- March 2001
- February 2001
- January 2001
- December 2000
- November 2000
- October 2000
- 0
Archive for 2010 August 14
Will the Economy Recover in Time for Obama?
2010 August 14 by Frank Monaldo.
While most Democrats will concede in moments of honesty that this year’s Congressional elections are likely to be very tough on Democrats, many like console themselves by citing President Ronald Reagan’s experience in his first term. Reagan came to office in difficult economic times with unemployment rising to double digits. In the first Congressional elections (1982) after Reagan’s election, Congressional Republicans paid the political price for poor economic times. Democrats gained 27 seats in the House. Republicans faired better in the Senate with the balance between the political parties remaining essentially the same. The analogy most heartening for supporters of President Barack Obama is the fact that as the economy recovered, Reagan’s popularity exploded as he won re-election in 1984 in a landslide taking every state except Minnesota, the home state of his opponent Walter Mondale. Reagan even came within 0.18% of the popular vote of winning Minnesota. Mondale was able to carry the District of Columbia, as Reagan secured the electoral college 525 to 13.
For history to repeat itself in Obama’s favor will require more than the poor a Congressional showing in the mid-term election. That’s the easy part. The economy will have to enjoy a strong recovery. It is interesting to determine if the pace of current recover with match itself in speed and magnitude with Reagan’s 1983-1984 recovery. A political potent measure of the economic recovery (though a lagging indicator) is the unemployment rate. Below is a table of the unemployment rates for the Reagan and Obama. The table begins on the data of the highest unemployment for each of the presidents.
| Reagan | Obama | ||
| Date | Unemployment Rate | Date | Unemployment Rate |
| Nov-82 | 10.8 | Oct-09 | 10.1 |
| Dec-82 | 10.8 | Nov-09 | 10.0 |
| Jan-83 | 10.4 | Dec-09 | 10.0 |
| Feb-83 | 10.4 | Jan-10 | 9.7 |
| Mar-83 | 10.3 | Feb-10 | 9.7 |
| Apr-83 | 10.2 | Mar-10 | 9.7 |
| May-83 | 10.1 | Apr-10 | 9.9 |
| Jun-83 | 10.1 | May-10 | 9.7 |
| Jul-83 | 9.4 | Jun-10 | 9.5 |
| Aug-83 | 9.5 | Jul-10 | 9.5 |
| Sep-83 | 9.2 | Aug-10 | |
| Oct-83 | 8.8 | Nov-10 | |
| Nov-83 | 8.5 | Dec-10 | |
| Dec-83 | 8.3 | Jan-11 | |
| Jan-84 | 8.0 | Feb-11 | |
| Feb-84 | 7.8 | Mar-11 | |
| Mar-84 | 7.8 | Apr-11 | |
| Apr-84 | 7.7 | May-11 | |
| May-84 | 7.4 | Jun-11 | |
| Jun-84 | 7.2 | Jul-11 | |
| Jul-84 | 7.5 | Aug-11 | |
| Aug-84 | 7.5 | Sep-11 | |
| Sep-84 | 7.3 | Oct-11 | |
| Oct-84 | 7.4 | Nov-11 | |
| Nov-84 | 7.2 | Dec-11 | |
| Dec-84 | 7.3 | Jan-12 | |
| Jan-85 | 7.3 | Feb-12 | |
| Feb-85 | 7.2 | Mar-12 | |
| Mar-85 | 7.2 | Apr-12 | |
| Apr-85 | 7.3 | May-12 | |
| May-85 | 7.2 | Jun-12 | |
| Jun-85 | 7.4 | Jul-12 | |
| Jul-85 | 7.4 | Aug-12 | |
| Aug-85 | 7.1 | Sep-12 | |
| Sep-85 | 7.1 | Oct-12 |
Interestingly, for both Reagan and Obama unemployment fell to 9.5% about eight months after the peak. However, unemployment had to fall from 10.8% rather than 10.1% for Reagan. At this point after the peak unemployment for Reagan, GDP was growing at at rate of 9% with the economy rapiding regaining jobs. The growth now rate is at best 3% and probably lower. In order for unemployment to abate at the same rate for Obama as during the Reagan recovery unemployment would have to fall to 8.5% by the end of this year. No one anticipates this. Indeed, the latest estimates from the Obama Administration suggests an employment rate over 8% when Obama stand for re-election. By contrast, on election day 1984 unemployment stood at 7.2%, over 3% points below its peak.
Obama has more about one more year than Reagan did for his recovery to take hold before his bid for re-election, but Obama’s recovery thus far has been at a lower rate. Obama will at best have an unemployment rate a full percentage point above what Reagan faced on election day.
To maximize chances for re-election, Obama needs to implement policies to increase economic growth. Thus far, high levels of government spending have done more to spook business than encourage it.
Posted in Politics, Economics | Print | No Comments »