You are currently browsing the Frank’s Case Book weblog archives for the day 2010 June 6.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
- Afghanistan (4)
- climate change (1)
- Economics (72)
- Education (21)
- health care (9)
- healthcare (8)
- Iraq (5)
- Law (120)
- Politics (387)
- Social Commentary (308)
- terrorism (2)
- Uncategorized (3)
- 2011 September 2: Thoughts on Evolution and Republican Candidates
- 2011 August 13: It's Not the Stimulus It's the Regulation
- 2011 August 6: Liberal Bias in the Media: A Study
- 2011 July 17: Bytes of the Apple
- 2011 June 19: Judge's Lesson
- 2011 June 12: The Quiet Death of the War Powers Act
- 2011 May 29: From Chickens to Rabbits
- 2011 May 8: Quick Thoughts on Bin Laden Killing
- 2011 May 1: Net Neutrality
- 2011 April 17: Atlas Shrugged: The Book and Movie
Columnists
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- May 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- January 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001
- June 2001
- May 2001
- April 2001
- March 2001
- February 2001
- January 2001
- December 2000
- November 2000
- October 2000
- 0
Archive for 2010 June 6
Do the Polls Indicate Obama Should Move to the Left?
2010 June 6 by Frank Monaldo.
The Rasmussen polls have a demonstrated history of accuracy at least in terms of election outcomes. This pollster has managed to accurately identify likely voters in a way that mimics election results. They certainly nailed the percentage differences in the 2008 President elections. All polls have their idiosynrcaies, especially in terms of the absolute values. However, most polls do an excellent job in tracking changes in pulblic sentiment.
All national polls have some presidential approval metric. RealClearPolitics.com tracks an average of many polls. President Barack Obama’s composite approval rating at the start of his Administration was in the plus-60% range. In recent months, the approval has fallen below the 50% mark.
Over the last few years, Rasmussen polls have focuses on an additional metric, the difference between those who strongly approve and those who strongly disapprove of the President’s performance. The goal is measure voter intensity. At the beginning of the Obama’s term, the strongly approve numbers were over 40% while the strongly disapproval number were well below 20%.
The plot below shows the temporal changes in this metric. In the summer of 2009, when new government medical plan was under ernest consideration, the President’s numbers were rapdily changing. Around August, the percentage of people who strongly approved of Obama’s performance fell consistently below the percentage of those who who strongly disapprove.
![]() |
What is interesting is that the number of people who strongly disapprove seems relatively stable at about 40%. However, the number of who strongly approve seems to be strongly dependent on specific events. For example, in January 2010, after the State of the Union address, Obama’s supporters were heartened and some of those who register approval moved into the strongly approves category. However, that poll pop was short lived.
Immediately after the passage of the health care bill, the frustration of Obama’s supporters about the bill wes eased, and Obama experienced a longer-lived increase in the numbers who strongly approve. However, the strong approvers have dwindled since then. Whether because the glow of the passage of the health care bill has dimmed or because of the tragic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, fewer and fewer people strongly approve of the President’s performance.
Midterm election are often an referendum on presidential leadership and a president’s party. Moreover, midterms elections are more strongly dependent on enthusiasm that fuels turn out. Since the overall presidential approval ratings and Obama’s strong disapproval ratings have stabilized, it would seem wise for Obama to veer to the Left to shore up the energy of his strong supporters.
Posted in Politics | Print | No Comments »
